Home / Guides / Consultation fees and no-shows

Charging for the first consultation: how South African practices cut no-shows

247clerk · Published 19 August 2026 · Updated 19 August 2026 · 7 min read

Every practice that offers a free first consultation is running an unpriced marketing campaign whose main cost is partner time. It is worth being clear-eyed about what that campaign buys, because for most professional practices the answer is: a diary full of people who wanted a free opinion.

What the free consultation actually costs

Take an hour of a mid-level attorney's time at a conservative R1 800. A practice offering free first consultations that runs eight of them a week, of which three convert, has spent nine hours — roughly R16 000 of billable capacity — to win three matters. That is not necessarily a bad trade. But it is a R16 000 monthly marketing spend that never appears in a marketing budget, is never measured, and cannot be turned down when it is not working.

Now add the no-shows. Free appointments are, in the industry's least surprising finding, the ones people skip. A slot held for someone who does not arrive costs the same as one they attend and returns nothing.

What a fee does that a screening call cannot

A consultation fee does four things at once, and only the first is revenue:

1. It pays for the hour. Modestly, but it stops the hour being a donation.
2. It filters. Someone unwilling to pay R750 to discuss a R400 000 claim is telling you something useful about how the matter will run.
3. It commits. Payment converts a vague intention into an appointment the client has a stake in. This is the mechanism behind the no-show drop — not the amount, the act.
4. It sets the frame. A client who pays for the first hour has understood, before they arrive, that your time is the product.

The third point deserves emphasis because it is the one practices doubt. The fee does not need to be large to work. It needs to be paid, and it needs to be paid before the slot is confirmed rather than invoiced afterwards.

Getting the price right

Three questions settle it.

Is it credited against the matter?

Usually yes, and say so up front. "R1 500 for 45 minutes, credited in full against your fees if we take the matter" converts far better than a bare R1 500, because it reframes the fee as a deposit rather than a toll. It also removes the awkward implication that you are charging to decide whether to work with someone.

Is it proportionate to the matter?

A R750 consultation is sensible for a family law enquiry and slightly absurd for a R40 million commercial dispute where the client would happily pay ten times that for an hour of the right partner's attention. Practices with genuinely mixed work often run two tiers — a standard intake consultation and a partner consultation — and let the screening decide which is offered.

Does it stand next to your hourly rate?

The fee should look like a fraction of your rate, not a competing product. If your rate is R3 000 an hour and your consultation is R400, the client's reasonable inference is that the consultation is not with you.

Take the money at booking

This is the mechanical part, and it is where most practices lose the benefit. The sequence that works:

1. Screen the enquiry enough to know it is in scope.
2. Offer two or three genuine slots.
3. The moment one is chosen, send a payment link — PayFast, Stripe, Yoco, whatever you already use.
4. Confirm the slot on payment, not on selection.
5. Send the confirmation, the document list and a reminder the day before.

Step 4 is the whole intervention. A slot that is "provisionally held pending payment" behaves exactly like a free slot. A slot confirmed by payment behaves like a commitment. The gap between the two is where no-shows live.

The timing matters as much as the mechanism. A payment link sent within seconds of the client choosing a time is paid at a far higher rate than one sent the next morning, because you are asking while the client is still holding their phone and still worried about their problem. This is one of the strongest arguments for automating intake at all — the link goes out at 23:45, not at 08:30.

How to say it

The wording does most of the work. Some phrasings that hold up:

"The initial consultation is R1 500 for 45 minutes. If we take the matter, that comes off your first invoice. I have Thursday at 10:00 or Friday at 08:30 — which suits?"

Note what it does: states the price, removes the sting, and moves immediately to the choice. It does not apologise, and it does not ask permission to charge. Compare the version that fails: "We do charge for consultations, is that okay?" — which invites a negotiation you have no reason to open.

For the client who pushes back, the honest answer is usually the best one: "We used to consult for free and found we were spending our mornings on enquiries we couldn't help with. Charging for the first hour means the people we do see get a proper one."

When not to charge

There are real exceptions, and pretending otherwise makes the advice useless:

• Contingency and RAF-type work, where the client's inability to pay anything now is the premise of the arrangement.
• Pro bono and referred work, where the fee would defeat the point.
• Genuine emergencies. An urgent interdict with a deadline in 48 hours is not the moment to hold up the diary for a payment link. Take the matter; sort out the money after.
• Existing clients. A fee that applies to someone who has instructed you three times reads as a tax on loyalty.

The point of a policy is that it is applied to new enquiries by default and waived deliberately, rather than never applied because nobody wants to be the one to raise it.

Measuring whether it worked

Track four numbers for a quarter before and after. Most practices have never had them in one place:

• Enquiries received.
• Consultations booked.
• Consultations attended (the no-show rate falls out of this).
• Matters opened.

Expect fewer consultations booked and a higher proportion attended and converted. That is the trade, and it is a good one — you are exchanging volume for hours that produce work. The number that decides it is matters opened, not consultations booked. Practices that panic at the drop in bookings usually abandon the policy a fortnight before it would have shown its value.